This is the most up to date version of this scale. There is also a short-form version.

Downloads


PAPER Lin, T. H., Dinner, H., Leung, T. L., Mutlu, B., Trafton, J. G., & Sebo, S. (2025, March). Connection-Coordination rapport (CCR) scale: a dual-factor scale to measure human-robot rapport. In 2025 20th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 869-879). IEEE.

Construct Summary

The authors define rapport as:

“A feeling of mutual understanding and interpersonal connection among individuals developed through interactions” (p. 2)

Final Scale Items (18 total):

Question wording: “Rate how much you think the following was present in the interaction.” A five-point scale was used: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neither Agree or Disagree, Agree, Strongly Agree.

Connection: Warmth, Empathy, Friendliness, Sympathy, Closeness, Positivity, Liking each other, Enthusiasm, Respect, Getting along, Excitement, Connection

Coordination: Coordination, Focus, Attentiveness, Smooth flow, Equal participation, Engagement

Rating = 100%

Check? Guideline Item
Is the construct defined?
Does the final version of the items capture the construct as it has been defined by the authors?
Is the item generation process discussed (e.g., literature review, Delphi method, crowd-sourcing)?
Person to items 10:1 for the initial set of items?
Did they perform an EFA, PCA, Rasch, or similar test to determine the item to factor relationship?
Did they describe how they determined number of factors?
Did they report the full initial set of items?
Did they provide loadings (EFA) or item fits (Rasch) of all items?
Is there a description of the item removal process (e.g., using infit/outfit, factor loading minimum value, or cross-loading values)?
Did they list the final items included in the scale?
Did they include a factor structure test (e.g., second EFA, CFA, DIF, test for unidimensionality when using Rasch, or similar)?
Was a measure of reliability (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha, McDonalds Omega_h or Omega_t, Tarkkonen’s Rho) reported?
Was a test of validity (e.g., predictive, concurrent, convergent, discriminant) reported?

Comments None.

Reviewed by Experts ✓