Psychological Safety Scale

This is the most up-to-date version of this scale.

Construct Summary

The authors report there are six fators of psychological safety:

“performance, humanness, acceptance, harmlesness, toughness, and agency” (p. 49)

Rating = 54%

Check?	Guideline Item
✖	Is the construct defined?
✖	Does the final version of the items capture the construct as it has been defined by the authors?
✓	Is the item generation process discussed (e.g., literature review, Delphi method, crowd-sourcing)?
✓	Person to items 10:1 for the initial set of items?
✓	Did they perform an EFA, PCA, Rasch, or similar test to determine the item to factor relationship?
✓	Did they describe how they determined number of factors?
✖	Did they report the full initial set of items?
✖	Did they provide loadings (EFA) or item fits (Rasch) of all items?
✓	Is there a description of the item removal process (e.g., using infit/outfit, factor loading minimum value, or cross-loading values)?
✓	Did they list the final items included in the scale?
✖	Did they include a factor structure test (e.g., second EFA, CFA, DIF, test for unidimensionality when using Rasch, or similar)?
✓	Was a measure of reliability (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha, McDonalds Omega_h or Omega_t, Tarkkonen’s Rho) reported?
✖	Was a test of validity (e.g., predictive, concurrent, convergent, discriminant) reported?

Comments
limitation: only for humanoid robots

Reviewed by Experts ✓

Downloads

PAPER
Kamide, H., Mae, Y., Kawabe, K., Shigemi, S., Hirose, M., & Arai, T. (2012, March). New measurement of psychological safety for humanoid. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 49-56).

PDF of scale as well as instructions for administration and scoring are not readily available. Check the paper for more details or email hriscaledatabase@gmail.com to submit this information if you are the author of this scale.

Final Scale Items (33 items):

Full final items not listed verbatim