Psychological Safety Scale

This is the most up-to-date version of this scale.

Construct Summary

The authors report there are six fators of psychological safety:

“performance, humanness, acceptance, harmlesness, toughness, and agency” (p. 49)

Rating = 54%

Check?	Guideline Item
✖	Is the construct defined?
✖	Does the final version of the items capture the construct as it has been defined by the authors?
✓	Is the item generation process discussed (e.g., literature review, Delphi method, crowd-sourcing)?
✓	Person to items 10:1 for the initial set of items?
✓	Did they perform an EFA, PCA, Rasch, or similar test to determine the item to factor relationship?
✓	Did they describe how they determined number of factors?
✖	Did they report the full initial set of items?
✖	Did they provide loadings (EFA) or item fits (Rasch) of all items?
✓	Is there a description of the item removal process (e.g., using infit/outfit, factor loading minimum value, or cross-loading values)?
✓	Did they list the final number of items included in the scale?
✖	Did they include a factor structure test (e.g., second EFA, CFA, DIF, test for unidimensionality when using Rasch, or similar)?
✓	Was a measure of reliability (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha, McDonalds Omega_h or Omega_t, Tarkkonen’s Rho) reported?
✖	Was a test of validity (e.g., predictive, concurrent, convergent, discriminant) reported?

Comments
limitation: only for humanoid robots

Reviewed by Experts ✓

Downloads

PAPER
Kamide, H., Mae, Y., Kawabe, K., Shigemi, S., Hirose, M., & Arai, T. (2012, March). New measurement of psychological safety for humanoid. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 49-56).

PDF of scale as well as instructions for administration and scoring are not readily available. Check the paper for more details or click here to submit this information if you are the author of this scale.

Final Scale Items (33 items):

Full final items not listed verbatim