Multidimensional Robot Attitude Scale
This is the most up-to-date version of this scale.
Downloads
PAPER
Ninomiya, T., Fujita, A., Suzuki, D., & Umemuro, H. (2015). Development of the multi-dimensional robot attitude scale: Constructs of people’s attitudes towards domestic robots. In Social Robotics: 7th International Conference, ICSR 2015, Paris, France, October 26-30, 2015, Proceedings 7 (pp. 482-491). Springer International Publishing.
Construct Summary
The authors do not provide a definition of the construct.
Final Scale Items (49 total):
Scale items are not publicly available at this time. We are reaching out to the authors to obtain appropriate permissions to share scale items. If you are the author of this scale and would like to provide such permission, please email us at hriscaledatabase@gmail.com
Rating = 46%
| Check? | Guideline Item |
|---|---|
| ✖ | Is the construct defined? |
| ✖ | Does the final version of the items capture the construct as it has been defined by the authors? |
| ✓ | Is the item generation process discussed (e.g., literature review, Delphi method, crowd-sourcing)? |
| ✖ | Person to items 10:1 for the initial set of items? |
| ✓ | Did they perform an EFA, PCA, Rasch, or similar test to determine the item to factor relationship? |
| ✓ | Did they describe how they determined number of factors? |
| ✖ | Did they report the full initial set of items? |
| ✖ | Did they provide loadings (EFA) or item fits (Rasch) of all items? |
| ✓ | Is there a description of the item removal process (e.g., using infit/outfit, factor loading minimum value, or cross-loading values)? |
| ✓ | Did they list the final items included in the scale? |
| ✖ | Did they include a factor structure test (e.g., second EFA, CFA, DIF, test for unidimensionality when using Rasch, or similar)? |
| ✓ | Was a measure of reliability (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha, McDonalds Omega_h or Omega_t, Tarkkonen’s Rho) reported? |
| ✖ | Was a test of validity (e.g., predictive, concurrent, convergent, discriminant) reported? |
Comments Two dimensions had only two items, no factor loadings shown, item removal process not replicable, unclear how exactly they defined “attitude”
PDF of scale as well as instructions for administration and scoring are not readily available. Check the paper for more details or email hriscaledatabase@gmail.com submit this information if you are the author of this scale.