NOTE: THIS IS NOT THE LATEST VERSION OF THIS SCALE.

Downloads

PAPER
Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3), 437-454.

Final Scale Items (14):

Scale items are not publicly available at this time. We are reaching out to the authors to obtain appropriate permissions to share scale items. If you are the author of this scale and would like to provide such permission, please email us at hriscaledatabase@gmail.com

Construct Summary

The authors define the construct of negative attitudes towards robots as follows:

“In considering negative attitudes toward robots, we need to take into account two psychological constructs related to it, which will be components of negative attitudes toward robots. One is the computer anxiety mentioned above, and the other is communication apprehension.” (p 440)

They define computer anxiety as follows:

“…considered to be anxiety or apprehension evoked in individuals when they use computers, do things leading them to computers, or think about the meaning of computers.” (p. 440)

They define communication apprehension as follows:

“…as a level of fear or anxiety in individuals toward real communication with another or others and prediction of it, such as speech, writing, singing, and so on.” (p. 441)

The authors define attitudes as follows:

“It is defined as a relatively stable and enduring predisposition to behave or react in a certain way toward persons, objects, institutions, or issues, and the source is cultural, familial, and personal.” (p. 440)

Rating = 69%

Check? Guideline Item
✓ Is the construct defined?
✓ Does the final version of the items capture the construct as it has been defined by the authors?
✓ Is the item generation process discussed (e.g., literature review, Delphi method, crowd-sourcing)?
✖ Person to items 10:1 for the initial set of items?
✓ Did they perform an EFA, PCA, Rasch, or similar test to determine the item to factor relationship?
✓ Did they describe how they determined number of factors?
✖ Did they report the full initial set of items?
✖ Did they provide loadings (EFA) or item fits (Rasch) of all items?
✖ Is there a description of the item removal process (e.g., using infit/outfit, factor loading minimum value, or cross-loading values)?
✓ Did they list the final items included in the scale?
✓ Did they include a factor structure test (e.g., second EFA, CFA, DIF, test for unidimensionality when using Rasch, or similar)?
✓ Was a measure of reliability (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha, McDonalds Omega_h or Omega_t, Tarkkonen’s Rho) reported?
✓ Was a test of validity (e.g., predictive, concurrent, convergent, discriminant) reported?

Comments None


PDF of scale as well as instructions for administration and scoring are not readily available. Check the paper for more details or email hriscaledatabase@gmail.com to submit this information if you are the author of this scale.

Reviewed by Experts ✓